Traditional Farcical Elements Found in Kevin Smith's "Clerks"

Looking at the definitions by Maurice Charney and Barbara Freedman of farce, the first reckon that came to straits was not Feydeau or even Peter Bogdanovich (director of Whats Up, mendelevium?), provided Kevin Smiths Clerks. The story of one (very bad) day in the life of Dante Hicks is a fairly dark comedy, and doesnt seem silly enough on the face of it to be a farce, but a negative look at the film and the subjectistics of farce, I think, will let go me out. To start from the end, and with the most cinematic aspect of the film (which was molar pretty much with the set-down-the-camera-and-walk-away strategy), is the accelerated climax of the story. The press picture between Dante and Randal in which the store is destroyed, and then the clean-up sequence in which it is restored, are shot in time-lapse, with big chunks of the movement of the persona just cut completely and not shown on screen. The entrancement of this cinematic strategy is that the action of the clim ax is over in about thirty seconds and the denouement (easy to spot, since Smith labels it) begins almost now.

The fighting scene was brought about in the first place by the disclosure of information (by Randal) that Dante was concealing from his girlfriend (Veronica), which followed almost straight on the heels of Silent Bobs monologue and Dantes sudden change of subject matter with regard to what it is he wants out of life. Just as our spirit is realizing Hes right....I love her! Randal is saying to Veronica, So thats it. He doesnt love you anymore.... Take, also, the encephalon that this ending could only come as a penalisation to Dante for betraying his girlfriend and disr upting the social locate by cheating with h! is ex (the town whore), who... If you want to get a full essay, ensnare it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay