12 Angry Men

Gabriel Cardona Communication 101 October 22, 2012 12 Angry work force If on that point is a honest doubt in your minds as to the evil of the impeach, a levelheaded doubt, then you must bring me a verdict of Not Guilty. If, however, theres no liable doubt, then you must, in right(a) conscience, find the accused Guilty. Judge. Twelve Angry Men is a disastrous and white exact from the 1950s in which 12 manpower from different backgrounds and lifestyles must use chemical group communication to resolve a young, mis hire boys fate. wholly custody are lead into a jury room to slough their individual votes and watc h a final verdict to the trial. All that think hes guilty raise your glide by and 11 men do so, all those non-guilty raise your circulate juryman 8 bravely raises his hand.

It is from this point that juryman 8 through his reasonable doubt shows leadership qualities, forms cliques and defies group climate. At the start of the film juror 8 is looking tabu the window impassively listening to his surroundings. He begins his leadership craft office when becoming the precisely juror to vote non-guilty. His low form of communication in which he is assuming a leadership role is by taking on a feminine persona. He accomplishes this by taking into consideration the unavoidably of other s, specifically juror 7 whom is concerned ab! out lose a baseball game. jurywoman 8 consoles the other juror by stating: dont worry your game doesnt start for another hour. other way juror 8 continues in his leadership role is by sticking to his droll verdict, although the other men try out to pursue him otherwise. They collide with turns giving examples as to why the boy is guilty, however juror 8 stands up to the men, not with assertion but with discussion, locution I just necessity to call downits...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay