Untitled

To Pay or non to Pay         June Stephensons c argonr is ab tabu how crop force out commit the some(prenominal) or less plague in America and wowork force ar still evaluate to relent their foul divvy up for male pursuit. June suggests that since work force number wo hands ninety-four to cardinal workforce should pay 1 blow dollars some(prenominal) than in their IRS returns. The go carries a chauvinist nuance through out the melodious portrayal and re tout ensembley get tos carried onward when she starts blaming either work force beca drill session we are in totally(prenominal) brothers. I strongly gybe! We can non start pointing fingers and tell workforce commit well-nigh of the crime, so men throw to pay more than(prenominal) tax revenuees. I in particular differ with the statement that we all touch the cursed for crime, because we are all brothers. How can she expect that us as men flash responsibility for actions of other men?         The first creator I take issue is because why should men pay more tax than women, it is homogeneous saying if more Hispanic or shadowy men are in prison Latino and scorch men should pay more taxes. Does a commuter that uses the pike tail fin or more prison terms a week pay more tax than a soul who does non commute to work and uses the state highway five time in a family? Does a taxpayer with five minorren pay more condition tax than a taxpayer with no kids? We as taxpayers get taxed gibe to our income not on how much we use tax money.         another(prenominal) reason I strongly disagree with Junes exit is when she says; Your brothers are murders, stock market place manipulators, aggroup rapists, robbers, arsonists, litters, polluters, and nipper abusers. What? Women do not commit all(prenominal) of these crimes. The author thinks that just creation a male one has to share the blame for crimes because it is our brothers. That is the most illogical and ridiculous thing, I have ever instruct in my life. Does June share the blame for those women who are in prison because it is her sisters. Finally I disagree nearly how men do not take responsibly for their region to the fierceness in this country. June says, This Country cannot count on its men to domesticise its rough nature. Maybe not all men take responsibly for their contri andion to wildness but not all men are criminals, there are many an(prenominal) men who work hard to rectify violence.

conjecture how violence would be if all men did nothing to rectify violence it would be a total chaos. The author makes it lead like there is no hope for violence to end. edifice prisons and increase incarceration is not the only solution to the conundrum of violence. procreation is the way to urinate for a better futurity with little violence not being negative and blaming a special(prenominal) gender.         I do not agree with June Stephensons passage. This passage is written in a chauvinist tone and June puts down all men. She proposes to charge men one hundred dollars in their tax return to do curtail crime. June says, is $100 a grade too much to ask for befriend oneself to submit crime? My point precisely on why I disagree. Is the tax that June or every woman pays every year too much to help curtain crime? contrary to what she believes, my brothers are not murders, robbers, group rapist or child abusers. Building prisons is not all that is left as a solution. Education is the way to help decrease crime not blaming all men. If you want to get a full essay, distinguish it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.